diff --git a/PadelClubDataTests/SyncDataAccessTests.swift b/PadelClubDataTests/SyncDataAccessTests.swift
index f382126..0be87e5 100644
--- a/PadelClubDataTests/SyncDataAccessTests.swift
+++ b/PadelClubDataTests/SyncDataAccessTests.swift
@@ -79,9 +79,14 @@ struct SyncDataAccessTests {
         let tournamentColA: SyncedCollection<Tournament> = await StoreCenter.main.mainStore.asyncLoadingSynchronizedCollection()
         let eventColB: SyncedCollection<Event> = await self.secondStoreCenter.mainStore.asyncLoadingSynchronizedCollection()
         let tournamentColB: SyncedCollection<Tournament> = await self.secondStoreCenter.mainStore.asyncLoadingSynchronizedCollection()
-
+        
+        if let dataAccessCollection = StoreCenter.main.dataAccessCollection {
+            await dataAccessCollection.deleteAsync(contentOfs: Array(dataAccessCollection))
+        }
+        
         await eventColA.deleteAsync(contentOfs: Array(eventColA))
         await tournamentColA.deleteAsync(contentOfs: Array(tournamentColA))
+        
         let _ = try await self.secondStoreCenter.testSynchronizeOnceAsync()
         
         #expect(eventColB.count == 0)
@@ -114,6 +119,12 @@ struct SyncDataAccessTests {
         #expect(eventColB.count == 0)
         #expect(tournamentColB.count == 0)
         
+        let dataAccesses: [DataAccess] = try await StoreCenter.main.service().get()
+        #expect(dataAccesses.count == 0)
     }
     
+    // tester les shared data, les relationship add/remove shared/ou non
+    
+    // trouver le moyen de tester les sous-Store et voir si on peut essayer de rendre ça propre sans passer par DataStore ou autre
+    
 }